IJAESsince 2000 International Journal of Arabic-English Studies

“Tradition” in T.S. Eliot’s The Family Reunion and Mikhail Na’ima’s Aba’ wa al Bnun (Parents and Sons)

Abstract

This study examines the analogous qualities between T. S. Eliot and Mikhail Na’ima’s definition of “tradition” and how the concept is applied in The Family Reunion (1939), a play in verse written by Eliot and Aba’ wa al Bnun (Parents and Sons) (1917), a colloquial drama composed by Na’ima. As influential critics, both writers used “tradition” as a vehicle for the promotion of a new definition of culture. Therefore, Terry Eagleton’s Idea of Culture and Eliot’s Notes towards a Theory of Culture provide an additional theoretical framework that reveals how both critics/dramatists have focused on the concept of “tradition” as a means for cultivating a modernist identity seeking high culture and as a crucial tool in the pursuit of distinctive styles and original thematic ideas. The theoretical concept of “tradition” evolved as a result of unique circumstances that both writers experienced. However, the reflective writing on their own plays testifies to the difficulty of applying theoretical frameworks in dramatic works. In conclusion, Eliot and Na’ima experimented with the genre and decided to keep their plays as examples for future playwrights.

Authors

Raja Alkhalili

DOI

Keywords

Full Text :

ijaes.net/article/fulltext/view?volume=12&issue=1&id=2

References

  1. Al-Musawi, Muhsin Jassim. (2002). ‘Engaging tradition in modern Arabic poetry’. Journal of Arabic Literature, 33/2: 172-210.
  2. Altoma, Salih. (2005). Modern Arabic Literature in Translation: A Companion. London: SAQI.
  3. Bolton, Matthew. (2006). ‘Literary contexts in plays: T. S. Eliot’s The Famil Reunion’. Great Neck Publishing, 1-2.
  4. Carpentier, Martha. (1989). ‘Orestes in the drawing room: Asechylean parallels in T. S. Eliot’s ‘The Family Reunion’’. Twentieth Century Literature, 35/1: 17-43.
  5. Dabbagh, Hussein. (1983). Mikhail Naimy: Some Aspects of his Thought as Revealed in his Writings. Durham: University of Durham. Center for Middle Eastern Studies.
  6. Darraj, Susan. (2004). Sheraerzade’s Legacy: Arab and Arab American Women on Writing. Westport: Praeger.
  7. Eagleton, Terry. (2000). The Idea of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
  8. Eliot, T. S. (1939). The Family Reunion. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company. (1948). Notes towards a Definition of Culture. London: Faber and Faber. (1920). ‘Tradition and the individual talent’. In McMicael George (ed.), Anthology of American Literature, 1400-09. New York: Macmillan.(1922). The Waste Land. In Michael North (ed.). The Waste Land. New York: Norton, 2001.
  9. Goash, AlKhour Touk Joseph. (1999). Mikhail Nai’ma the Literary Giant: An Anthology. Dar Nublees: Beriut.
  10. Grant, Michael (ed). (1982). T. S. Eliot: The Critical Heritage. London: Routledge
  11. Huri, Yair. (2005). ‘‘To flee from all languages’: The gap between language and experience in the works of modern Arab poets’. Arab Studies Quarterly, 27/4: 1-16.
  12. Jubran, Sulaiman. (2007). ‘Classical elements in Mahjar poetry’. Journal of Arabic Literature, 38/1: 67-77.
  13. Kubaein, Raymond. (1987). The Spiritual Inclination in Gibran and Nai’ma. Dar Alfikr: Beirut.
  14. Moghni, Abdul. (1987). Eliot’s Concept of Culture. New Delhi: S. Chand.
  15. Mohamed, Mansoor Ibrahim. (1999). ‘The Sufi dimension in the poetry of the North American poets and its link to romanticism: Gibran Khali Gibran, Naseeb Arida, Mikhail Naimy’. Alam Alfikr, 28/1: 41-76.
  16. Muneer, Waleed.(1992). Literary Critics: Mikhail Nai’ma. Cairo: Egyptian Higher Consul.
  17. Na’ima, Mikhail. (1978). Aba’ wa al Bnun(Parents and Sons). Beirut: Noufal. (1927). Al Ghrbal. 16th Ed. Beirut: Noufal. (1978). Au’b. Beirut: Noufal. (1952). Book of Mirdad. Beirut: Dar Beirut.(1945). Hamas Aljofoon. Beirut: Noufal.
  18. Orfalea, Gregory and Sharif Elmusa. (1988). Grape Leaves: A Century of Arab American Poetry. University of Utah Press. (2006). ‘The Arab American novel’. MELUS, 31: 115-133.
  19. Pormann, Peter. (2006). ‘‘The Arab ‘Cultural Awakening (Nahd a)’, 1870- 1950, and the classical tradition’. International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 13/1: 4-20.
  20. Shaba’, Mohamed Shafeq. (1979). The Philosophy of Mikhail Naimy: An Analysis and Criticism. Beirut: Bahsoon Publications.
  21. Skaf, Mamdooh. (1985). ‘Mikhail Naimy as a poet between the critical approach and creative application’. Almarefa, 24/280: 50-75.
  22. Smith, Carol. (1996). ‘The Family Reunion’. In. Sheila Sullivan(ed.), Critics on T. S. Eliot, 93-98. New Delhi: Universal Book Stall.
  23. Tamplin, Ronald. (1988). A Preface to T. S. Eliot. New York: Longman.
  24. Tarebah, Mohamed. (2004). The Blessings of Criticism: Applied Critical Essays. Damascus: Dar Al- Yanabe.
  25. Tansi, Zaka. (1988). Between Gibran and Na’ima. Beirut: Maktabat Almarif.
  26. Turgeneve, Ivan . (1862). Fathers and Sons. Beirut: York Press.
  27. Ward, Anne. (1949). ‘Speculations on Eliot’s time-world: an analysis of The Family Reunion in relation to Hulme and Bergson’. American Literature, 21/1: 18-35.
  28. Wilder, Thornton. (1974). ‘Some thoughts on playwrighting’. In Dukore Bernard (ed.), Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 886-93. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 886-93.
  29. Zilcosky, John. (2005). ‘Modern monuments: T. S. Eliot, Nietzsche, and the problem of history’. Journal of Modern Literature. 29/1: 21-33.